09/21/2023 / By Laura Harris
Special Counsel Jack Smith has requested a gag order to restrict former President Donald Trump from speaking out against the government’s prosecution of him.
Smith, who was appointed by the Department of Justice (DOJ) to investigate the former chief executive, filed a motion to silence Trump on Sept. 15. His filing asked District Judge Tanya Chutkan to impose “a narrow, well-defined restriction” to prevent Trump from making statements “regarding the identity, testimony or credibility of prospective witnesses” and “about any party, witness, attorney, court personnel or potential jurors that are disparaging and inflammatory, or intimidating.”
“The defendant knows that when he publicly attacks individuals and institutions, he inspires others to perpetrate threats and harassment against his targets,” Smith stated. “The defendant continues these attacks on individuals precisely because he knows that in doing so, he is able to roil the public and marshal and prompt his supporters.”
The special counsel also referenced instances where Trump blasted the federal judge as “a fraud dressed up as a judge” or “a radical Obama hack.”
The motion continued: “The defendant’s repeated, inflammatory public statements regarding the District of Columbia, the Court, prosecutors, and potential witnesses are substantially likely to materially prejudice the jury pool, create fear among potential jurors, and result in threats or harassment to individuals he singles out.” (Related: The Trump indictment criminalizes political dissent.)
According to Smith, the gag order won’t prevent Trump from publicly claiming his innocence of the charges against him. But if Chutkan grants the gag order, Trump’s free speech rights guaranteed by the First Amendment will be infringed.
The Sept. 15 gag order request was linked to Trump’s case centering on the fraudulent 2020 elections. However, this was not the first time the special counsel wanted to silence the former president running for a second White House term.
Back in August, the DOJ – through Smith – asked for a similar request against Trump over his case centering on classified documents seized from the former president’s Mar-a-Lago home in Florida. According to the Justice Department, Trump shouldn’t be permitted to speak about “sensitive and confidential information” as it would have a “harmful chilling effect on witnesses or adversely affect the fair administration of justice in this case.”
The August motion stemmed from a Truth Social post from Trump that warned: “If you go after me, I’m coming for you.” The DOJ’s request filed hours after the post argued that the gag order “seeks to prevent … improper dissemination or use of discovery materials, including to the public.”
In response to the Sept. 15 motion, Trump denounced the “lying and deranged” Smith for suppressing his free speech rights in a post on Truth Social.
“I’m campaigning for president against an incompetent person who has weaponized the DOJ [and the] Federal Bureau of Investigation to go after his political opponent, and I am not allowed to comment? They leak, lie and sue – and they don’t want me to speak? How else would I explain that Smith is deranged, or Crooked Biden is incompetent?”
Trump.news has more stories about the former president.
Watch this MSNBC report about Special Counsel Jack Smith’s “narrow” gag order against Trump.
This video is from the NewsClips channel on Brighteon.com.
Special Counsel Jack Smith accused of deliberately impeding Trump’s presidential campaign.
Sources include:
Tagged Under:
2024 elections, biased, big government, cancel Democrats, conspiracy, corruption, deception, deep state, democrats, Donald Trump, election fraud, fascism, gag order, indictments, insanity, Jack Smith, Joe Biden, outrage, political dissent, politics, presidential elections, propaganda, rigged, suppressed, traitors, Trump indictment, truth, tyranny, Vote Republican
This article may contain statements that reflect the opinion of the author
COPYRIGHT © 2018 ABSURD.NEWS
All content posted on this site is protected under Free Speech. Absurd.news is not responsible for content written by contributing authors. The information on this site is provided for educational and entertainment purposes only. It is not intended as a substitute for professional advice of any kind. Absurd.news assumes no responsibility for the use or misuse of this material. All trademarks, registered trademarks and service marks mentioned on this site are the property of their respective owners.